I thought the point of the Presidential election was to have more than one good candidate on the ballot in the event that the elected President needs to resign or gets banned.
Two-clicker votes have decided an election before and I, for one, would feel more comfortable if there was more than one Presidential-level candidate on the ballot.
So while I think it's a great way to free up hundreds of active votes for our Croatian bros, I just want to caution folks that we could be leaving ourselves open to a very bad situation.
On second thought, the non-blocker-POTUS we want will no doubt be #2 if not #1, and from there it's a simple impeachment away from rectifying the situation.
Of course, that's if some PTO Senator doesn't propose an impeachment days before the election. Or if the impeachment proposal doesn't get stuck in pending (oh, Admins...).
Anyhow, while I still think there's risk in electing a blocker POTUS due to two-clickers, I think I'll come out in support of this revolutionary idea ahead of time.
By the way, the top 5 or 6 parties should continue to do this for Party President elections.