Author Topic: World Domination  (Read 530 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HeinekenCoC

  • The Biggest Beast
  • Close Talker
  • *******
  • Posts: 2356
  • ":((:"
Re: World Domination
« Reply #30 on: September 05, 2009, 03:29:09 PM »
When we recover I think we will free Indonesian/Iranian/Hungarian held states in China and India. Among these states are 2 High Iron Regions, maybe 3, but I forgot.
I AM AN IDIOT RAPE MY FACE
This sig endorsed by Admin Team on ruling from the courts; not to be removed by user

I Heineken, endorse the above message. Let's make sexy time.

Offline Sheriff Yoda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: World Domination
« Reply #31 on: September 05, 2009, 03:33:50 PM »
I'm not sure US is trying to keep neutral. The nature of the game is invading other countries' territories is a whole different beast from reclaiming your own. I think Indonesia would welcome an attempted invasion right now.

Yes, for the propaganda value if for no other reason.  No, our best move after we liberate North America is to liberate NK cause they bit the big one trying to block russia for us and we own them BIG.  Next we need to start dismantling the Empire, and I think India might be a good place to start.



Offline eugeneonegin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 735
Re: World Domination
« Reply #32 on: September 05, 2009, 03:36:24 PM »
I would like to see us go through Japan and take out Indonesia in China.

^this.

you know, indo's capital java, with over 5k reisdents doesnt even have a defense system, just a q5 hospital.

if we could get the aussies to move against W. Aus and then attack North we could strike at the heart of the indo empire. doesn't it make sense whilst theyre weak? even if we couldnt hold it due to RWs or whatever, imagine the propaganda coup.



Offline HeinekenCoC

  • The Biggest Beast
  • Close Talker
  • *******
  • Posts: 2356
  • ":((:"
Re: World Domination
« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2009, 03:40:00 PM »
I would like to see us go through Japan and take out Indonesia in China.

^this.

you know, indo's capital java, with over 5k reisdents doesnt even have a defense system, just a q5 hospital.

if we could get the aussies to move against W. Aus and then attack North we could strike at the heart of the indo empire. doesn't it make sense whilst theyre weak? even if we couldnt hold it due to RWs or whatever, imagine the propaganda coup.

That would activate their MPPs...and once that happens we're fucked.

Offline Gaius Julius

  • rockin' the suburbs
  • Military Personnel
  • Close Talker
  • **
  • Posts: 2935
  • "So we livin' life like a video"
Re: World Domination
« Reply #34 on: September 05, 2009, 03:42:26 PM »
i wish we were in the position to go tear-assing around the world but hey ho, so eUSA are trying to keep neutral at the moment, and when the US gain more power, revenge wouldnt spring to mind when PEACE are weaker?

"Revenge is the last thing we should ever do, no nation has ever survived over extending itself. Romania, Indo, Norway, Sweden and others have all messed up in the past by taking too many territories or trying to beat on the weak. Hell we got invaded because we we're jerks and beat on people weaker than us. So the concept of doing the same thing later down the line begs the question. Have we learned our lesson?

It is impossible to define "neutral in the current mess of diplomatic affairs, we of course love EDEN and Sol and AHA are pretty chill. As SoS I never say no to talking to anyone and every option (cept joining PEACE) is always on the table. Honestly this whole invasion has made countries such as Chile, Brazil, Argentina and other warm up to us.
"The fault dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in ourselves... "
Finland = Winland
The eUnited States is a digital construct.  Caring about the country is great but losing sight of the strategic parameters of the game is counter productive.
EDEN Assistant Supreme Commander (a.k.a. I am not allowed to sleep).

Offline Chocolate McSkittles

  • Narf!
  • Posts: 6527
  • "Participating in angry mobs since day 522"
Re: World Domination
« Reply #35 on: September 05, 2009, 04:20:30 PM »
Game mechanics wouldnt allow for it.

Any country that tried ot take the whole world (without support) would be constantly blocked by other countries.  The further extended a countries borders are, the more people there are to block you from attacking.
- Bittersweet Dark Choc

<+GF> EIN REICH EIN VOLK EIN CHOC


Offline Sheriff Yoda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: World Domination
« Reply #36 on: September 05, 2009, 04:57:31 PM »
i wish we were in the position to go tear-assing around the world but hey ho, so eUSA are trying to keep neutral at the moment, and when the US gain more power, revenge wouldnt spring to mind when PEACE are weaker?

"Revenge is the last thing we should ever do, no nation has ever survived over extending itself. Romania, Indo, Norway, Sweden and others have all messed up in the past by taking too many territories or trying to beat on the weak. Hell we got invaded because we we're jerks and beat on people weaker than us. So the concept of doing the same thing later down the line begs the question. Have we learned our lesson?

It is impossible to define "neutral in the current mess of diplomatic affairs, we of course love EDEN and Sol and AHA are pretty chill. As SoS I never say no to talking to anyone and every option (cept joining PEACE) is always on the table. Honestly this whole invasion has made countries such as Chile, Brazil, Argentina and other warm up to us.

I dare say we'd have been invaded even if we'd been pure in act and motive.

Offline Gaius Julius

  • rockin' the suburbs
  • Military Personnel
  • Close Talker
  • **
  • Posts: 2935
  • "So we livin' life like a video"
Re: World Domination
« Reply #37 on: September 05, 2009, 07:22:43 PM »
i wish we were in the position to go tear-assing around the world but hey ho, so eUSA are trying to keep neutral at the moment, and when the US gain more power, revenge wouldnt spring to mind when PEACE are weaker?

"Revenge is the last thing we should ever do, no nation has ever survived over extending itself. Romania, Indo, Norway, Sweden and others have all messed up in the past by taking too many territories or trying to beat on the weak. Hell we got invaded because we we're jerks and beat on people weaker than us. So the concept of doing the same thing later down the line begs the question. Have we learned our lesson?

It is impossible to define "neutral in the current mess of diplomatic affairs, we of course love EDEN and Sol and AHA are pretty chill. As SoS I never say no to talking to anyone and every option (cept joining PEACE) is always on the table. Honestly this whole invasion has made countries such as Chile, Brazil, Argentina and other warm up to us.

I dare say we'd have been invaded even if we'd been pure in act and motive.

Yeah but would Russia have been invading us? mmm nope, we opened that war to attack and take advantage of them. Besides I don't like handing PEACE propaganda on a golden platter. Hell some PEACE nations got pissed off by Indo and Hungary's actions. What if they had no cause to invade us? Do you really think they would have had full and total support. Your argument is that essentially they would have invaded us because people hate us no matter what, you can't provide proof of that because basically since the war module was created we've been invading countries. Is there anything wrong with that? No not in my opinion, a lot of countries (indonesia, Romania) have been ten times as imperialistic as we have been. Yet PEACE spins info like no ones business, going back to our old ways would be handing them that propaganda on a silver platter.
Finally the whole jumping into Asia is asking for trouble, Romania went in there and they got triple teamed, we would have to fight Indo (mpp's would handle that), Iran, Russia and any other puppet countries. If you want a giant death trap that's what it is.

Offline Avery Alexander

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: World Domination
« Reply #38 on: September 05, 2009, 08:47:39 PM »
One nation couldn't take the entire eWorld, but an alliance could.  And if that were to happen, the alliance would just breakup and war on each other afterward.

Offline Jon Barack Bluejacket

  • Resident Patriot
  • Forum God
  • ******
  • Posts: 1044
Re: World Domination
« Reply #39 on: September 05, 2009, 10:06:41 PM »
do you think america will be as strong as romania? after the next couple of months i mean

We tried to go down that road, and all we got for it was a bunch of stupid propaganda during the war, no I would prefer keeping our noses clean and depend on Indo and Hungary to play the bad guys.

Exactly.

I live in Cali in RL.

Yeah, I know it's just a game, but I didn't like being "occupied".

The US should keep a strong military-- but its' mission should be confined to defending the US, our allies, and helping the oppressed attain freedom.

Offline John Paul Jones

  • Lead Farmer Mutha Fucka
  • Global Moderator
  • Bro Of Extraordinary Power
  • *****
  • Posts: 5400
Re: World Domination
« Reply #40 on: September 05, 2009, 10:17:52 PM »
i wish we were in the position to go tear-assing around the world but hey ho, so eUSA are trying to keep neutral at the moment, and when the US gain more power, revenge wouldnt spring to mind when PEACE are weaker?

are you penguin bowling serious??  This idea of revenge and invading for shits and giggles is the same penguin bowling mindset that got us into this mess.  We are not invincible.  Ten penguin bowling days ago we had one penguin bowling state.  let's just get our states back, and get our allies their lands back.  At that point we can decide where to go from there.  We need to be a nation that stands for something, besides lol RWAR!!!! every penguin bowling 2 months.

Wang, you are such an innocent virgin that I expect 30 of you to be waiting for me in eParadise.
Quote from: Eugene Harlot
STFU and fight.

Offline Chocolate McSkittles

  • Narf!
  • Posts: 6527
  • "Participating in angry mobs since day 522"
Re: World Domination
« Reply #41 on: September 05, 2009, 10:40:25 PM »
I see absolutely no issue with invading territory as long as we do so without activating MPPs that will come back and bite us later, especially if that territory make the eUS or our allies stronger.

Offline Elderon Zakath

  • One Eye Is Omnipotent
  • *********
  • Posts: 4697
Re: World Domination
« Reply #42 on: September 05, 2009, 10:53:43 PM »
so eUSA are FORTIS leaders?

No, but it is a Fortis ( No caps, btw ) member.  So is Canada and Spain.  The UK supported the Hungarian assault and claim of lands that belong to US and Canada by allowing them to go through Scotland.

UK was offered to join Fortis, but they refused and claimed neutrality.  Fine, whatever, we knew it was a farce.  It was the Hungarian landswap that did it in though, that was pouring salt in a open wound.
In Tyler We Trust
Goodbye ol' friend

Win: LOL, MAGICK HAS HAPPENED, EVERYONE START CASTING SPELLS
Lose: Cry as EDEN High Command is RETARDED. ABSOLUTELY RETARDED.

Offline LiveFreeOrDie

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • "Magician's apprentice"
Re: World Domination
« Reply #43 on: September 06, 2009, 06:48:18 PM »
>We are in no position to go tear-assing around the world, and even if we were we shouldn't do it.  Every >country has a right to their original lands, even PEACE countries.

I agree. If the US stands for this principle, we will gain allies, and PEACE will weaken.